All Pairwise Comparisons among Means: Newman-Keuls Procedure (4 of 4)
Next section: Duncan's procedure
After the significant difference at span 3, differences not previously ruled
out at span 2 are tested. The comparison of Means 3 and 4 has been ruled
out by the failure of the comparison of Means 1 and 4 to be significant.
Therefore, the only comparison left to be performed is between Means 4 and
5. The t is 2.86 which is less than the critical value for a span of 2 of
2.95, so the difference is not significant. The Newman-Keuls procedure has
the advantage of being more powerful than the
Tukey
HSD. It is better at controlling the
EER
than the
Fisher's LSD. However, there are patterns
of population means that can lead to an inflated EER. For instance, if six
population means were: 10, 10, 100,100, 1,000, and 1,000
then comparisons among sample means at span 2 would almost certainly be
performed. The null hypothesis is true for three of these comparisons: Mean
1 versus Mean 2 Mean 3 versus Mean 4 Mean 5 versus Mean 6 Since the
PCER for these comparisons is 0.05, the EER is above 0.05.
Next section: Duncan's procedure