Reporting Results (1 of 2)
Results should be described as simply and as free of statistical jargon as possible.
It is best to start by presenting a graph or table that portrays the
descriptive
statistics. Then, describe the relevant findings in simple plain English.
Finally state which effects were statistically significant. A report of a the
hypothetical study comparing the effect of
background noise might
read as follows:
Table 1
Means and Standard Deviations of the
Number Correct by Noise Condition
Condition |
M |
s |
No Noise |
8.90 |
2.47 |
Moderate Noise |
5.60 |
2.50 |
Loud Noise |
2.60 |
2.22 |
As can be seen in Table 1, background noise had a substantial effect
on performance: the louder the background noise, the lower the performance.
Box plots further illustrating the differences are shown in Figure 1.
An analysis of variance was conducted and the effect of noise was significant,
F(2,27) = 5.94, p = 0.007. The Tukey HSD procedure revealed that all
pairwise differences among means were significant, p <0 .05.